Reply to comment

re: In apt you have a few

"But for that I need to understand how you use it :)"

blokje exactly addressed my beef with synaptics (and perhaps the apt backend for all I know).

There are times where I need to install something that is not available from a repository (at all or perhaps just not in the revision I need).

In doing so (by compiling or whatever) it is quite possible to run into a requirement for a specific library or library revision. With yum it is easy to determine the package that provides any given file.

e.g. yum provides lib.so.5.2

When I last tried apt/synaptics with pclinuxos (don't recall the revision but it a few years ago in the "big daddy" era - BTW don't ever quesiton package management on the pclos forums unless you want to be chewed a new one - illustrates why I no longer have interest in pclos) I was told that apt/synaptic didn't do that and that since I knew enough to be compiling my own software I should know enough to find that information in other ways (e.g. google).

Thats fine I suppose (though doesn't work at all if you're not in an internet connected position) but I find it annoying to have to turn to google or take the easy way and turn to my centos box to do "yum provides" to then fix my apt/synaptics box which cannot do that.

Or can it? I think that was blokje's question and it is certainly mine. That feature alone makes me a yum fan. The underlying RPM package manager affords that feature and yum supports it.

Reply

Please refrain from adding URLs to unrelated or commercial websites. This site is moderated and comments with inappropriate links are rejected. Thank you for your understanding.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options