Submitted by Ljubomir Ljubojevic (not verified) on Sun, 2011/05/15 - 14:16.
I read all threads in last 3 months.
Dag, the last name calling was because you accidently send 2 e-mails to dev mailing list where you wrote harsh accusations about CentOS dev team, and then said that you say those harsh words only behind their backs (in private e-mails/communication).
Also, you constanly ignore the fact that there were 4.9 and 5.6 releases before 6.0 and the fact that SL has not released SL5.6 yet. There is no way to objectively say that SL devs have released all 3 releses before CentOS devs and not strech the truth to the braking point.
All of your other debates I can not and will not comment, but my impression is that you have (also) contributed to this prolonged incident.
Release of CentOS 6.0 is scheduled for end of May, ~ two weeks from now, it's in QA now, so there is no need for requiems.
One side story is never the whole truth
I read all threads in last 3 months.
Dag, the last name calling was because you accidently send 2 e-mails to dev mailing list where you wrote harsh accusations about CentOS dev team, and then said that you say those harsh words only behind their backs (in private e-mails/communication).
Also, you constanly ignore the fact that there were 4.9 and 5.6 releases before 6.0 and the fact that SL has not released SL5.6 yet. There is no way to objectively say that SL devs have released all 3 releses before CentOS devs and not strech the truth to the braking point.
All of your other debates I can not and will not comment, but my impression is that you have (also) contributed to this prolonged incident.
Release of CentOS 6.0 is scheduled for end of May, ~ two weeks from now, it's in QA now, so there is no need for requiems.
Ljubomir